Change of Management Control from the Balanced Scorecard to Budgeting: Case-Study Evidence from a Commercial Bank

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kapiyangoda, K. K.
dc.contributor.author Gooneratne, T. N.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-04T06:26:16Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-04T06:26:16Z
dc.date.issued 2013-12
dc.identifier.issn 1800-363X
dc.identifier.uri http://220.247.247.85:8081/handle/123456789/7909
dc.description.abstract Althoughthe balanced scorecard (BSC) is claimed to be conceptually superior to budgeting,not all BSC implementations get sustained, and some organizations even move back to budgetary control systems.Using the qualitative case study approach,this study investigates the reasons for the change of management controlfrom BSC to budgeting in a Sri Lankan commercial bank.To capture thesereasons, a revised Accounting Change Model of Cobb, Helliar, and Inns (1995) was used. This study contributes to literature by further developing Cobb et al.’s (1995) Model, by sub-categorizing the momentum for change into three elements: people, processes and external triggers, based on the case study evidence. en_US
dc.language.iso other en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Management & Finance, University of Colombo en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Volume. 04, No. 02 & Volume. 05, No. 01;
dc.subject Management control systems en_US
dc.subject Budgetary control en_US
dc.subject Balanced scorecard en_US
dc.subject Bank en_US
dc.subject Sri Lanka en_US
dc.title Change of Management Control from the Balanced Scorecard to Budgeting: Case-Study Evidence from a Commercial Bank en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.accno 16216 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account