dc.contributor.author |
Muruganandan, S. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-01-07T10:36:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-01-07T10:36:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-06 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2579-2210 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1800-363x |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://220.247.247.85:8081/handle/123456789/36814 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This study examines the economic feasibility of technical analysis, such as relative
strength index, moving average convergence and divergence in Indian context. Bombay
Stock Exchange Sensex Index historical data were collected from BSE data base for the
period from February, 2000 to May, 2018. The selected data were further categorised into
Bull and Bear markets to test the technical tools performance across market cycle. The
results exhibited that relative strength index trading rule failed to deliver the positive return
even before deducting transaction cost. However, moving average convergence and
divergence trading rules’ sell signal outperformed the unconditional mean return and buy
signal mean return, during the Bear market period before deducting transaction cost.
However, in accordance with the Sharpe ratio, returns generated were not at the level of risk
associated in technical trading rules. The findings question the possibility for traders to
consistently earn abnormal return with technical analysis. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
other |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Faculty of Management & Finance, University of Colombo |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Volume. 11;No. 01 |
|
dc.subject |
Indian Stock Market |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Market Cycle |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Moving Average Convergence and Divergence |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Relative Strength Index |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Technical Analysis |
en_US |
dc.title |
Testing the Profitability of Technical Trading Rules across Market Cycles: Evidence from India |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.accno |
45741 |
en_US |